|
|
2012's Worst
Midsize SUVs Sold in North America:
Table and Charts
by James Bleeker
This page provides the table giving the 2012 Auto Reliability GPAs of the
worst midsize sport-utility vehicles in 2012, a chart of manufacturer shares of the worst
midsize SUVs in 2012, and a chart depicting the Overall Reliability GPAs of the 9 best midsize SUVs in 2012
and the 11 worst midsize SUVs in 2012.
The Table
The table below provides the 2012 Auto Reliability GPAs and Grades of the worst of
the midsize sport-utility vehicles sold in the U.S.
Reliability GPAs for 4 age ranges are given so that the
visitor may examine more closely the age range that is of
greater interest to him or her.
Letter grades for automobile reliability are determined thusly: A if the Auto Reliability GPA is 3.50 to
4.00, B if the Auto Reliability GPA is 2.50 to 3.49, C if the Auto Reliability GPA is 1.50 to 2.49, D if
the Auto Reliability GPA is 0.50 to 1.49, and F if the Auto Reliability GPA < 0.50.
The list of the worst midsize SUVs in 2012 includes those vehicles with an Overall Auto Reliability GPA
from 0 to 1.84 - in letter grade, from the lowest F to a low C. The list is in
ascending order of Overall GPA, i.e., from worst to less worse.
The list of the worst midsize SUVs in 2012 is of value to
those buyers who want to avoid the worst, but are rather
indifferent to whether a vehicle model is among the best.
The Reliability
GPAs and Grades of the Worst Midsize SUVs in 2012
|
| ID |
Auto Manufacturer |
Line |
Model |
Model GPA for 0-to-4 Year Old
Vehicles |
Model GPA for 2-to-6 Year Old
Vehicles |
Model GPA for 4-to-8 Year Old
Vehicles |
Model GPA for 6-to-10 Year Old
Vehicles |
Overall Reliability GPA |
Grade Based on Overall GPA |
Minimum Reliability GPA |
Grade Based on Minimum GPA |
Number of Model Years of Data |
| 376 |
Volkswagen |
Volkswagen |
Touareg |
|
|
0.00 |
0.00 |
0.00 |
F |
0.00 |
F |
1 |
|
111 |
Chrysler |
Dodge |
Journey |
0.33 |
0.00 |
|
|
0.17 |
F |
0.00 |
F |
3 |
|
282 |
Kia |
Kia |
Sorento, V6 |
0.50 |
0.67 |
0.75 |
0.33 |
0.56 |
D |
0.33 |
F |
7 |
| 78 |
BMW |
BMW |
X5, 6-cylinder |
0.33 |
0.50 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.71 |
D |
0.33 |
F |
9 |
| 190 |
General Motors |
Cadillac |
SRX, V6 |
1.33 |
0.67 |
0.50 |
0.50 |
0.75 |
D |
0.50 |
D |
7 |
| 222 |
General Motors |
GMC |
Envoy, V8 |
0.00 |
0.33 |
1.00 |
1.67 |
0.75 |
D |
0.00 |
F |
6 |
| 202 |
General Motors |
Chevrolet |
Equinox, V6 |
1.75 |
1.25 |
0.67 |
0.00 |
0.92 |
D |
0.00 |
F |
7 |
| 289 |
Land Rover -
Tata |
Land Rover |
LR3 |
|
1.00 |
1.00 |
|
1.00 |
D |
1.00 |
D |
1 |
| 386 |
Volvo - Geely |
Volvo |
XC90,
6-cylinder |
1.50 |
2.00 |
0.67 |
0.00 |
1.04 |
D |
0.00 |
F |
5 |
| 126 |
Daimler |
Mercedes-Benz |
M-Class, V6 |
1.75 |
1.00 |
0.50 |
1.00 |
1.06 |
D |
0.50 |
D |
7 |
| 239 |
General Motors |
Pontiac |
Torrent |
1.50 |
1.25 |
1.00 |
|
1.25 |
D |
1.00 |
D |
4 |
| 339 |
Porsche |
Porsche |
Cayenne |
0.00 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|
1.33 |
D |
0.00 |
F |
2 |
| 293 |
Mazda |
Mazda |
CX-7 |
2.67 |
1.67 |
0.00 |
|
1.44 |
D |
0.00 |
F |
4 |
| 327 |
Nissan |
Nissan |
Pathfinder |
1.50 |
1.67 |
1.25 |
1.50 |
1.48 |
D |
1.25 |
D |
8 |
| 89 |
Chrysler |
Jeep |
Grand Cherokee,
6-cylinder, V6 |
2.25 |
2.00 |
1.25 |
0.50 |
1.50 |
C |
0.50 |
D |
10 |
| 184 |
General Motors |
Buick |
Rendezvous |
|
1.50 |
1.75 |
1.25 |
1.50 |
C |
1.25 |
D |
6 |
| 77 |
BMW |
BMW |
X5, 35d |
1.50 |
|
|
|
1.50 |
C |
1.50 |
C |
2 |
| 90 |
Chrysler |
Jeep |
Grand Cherokee,
V8 |
1.25 |
1.75 |
2.00 |
|
1.67 |
C |
1.25 |
D |
6 |
| 136 |
Ford |
Ford |
Edge, all-wheel
drive |
1.50 |
2.00 |
2.00 |
|
1.83 |
C |
1.50 |
C |
5 |
| 262 |
Hyundai |
Hyundai |
Santa Fe, 4
cylinder |
1.50 |
|
2.00 |
2.00 |
1.83 |
C |
1.50 |
C |
4 |
|
| |
Note that among the worst midsize sport-utility vehicles in 2012, there is not one by
Toyota Motor Corporation or Honda Motor Company.
The manufacturers which have offered one or more of the most trouble prone
midsize SUVs in 2012, as reported by Consumer Reports subscribers and
measured by the Overall Reliability GPA, are General Motors Corporation
(with 3 of the 10 worst and 5 of the 20 worst), the Chrysler Group (with 3 of the
20 worst), BMW AG (with 2 of the 20 worst), Volkswagen AG, Kia Motors
Corporation, Land Rover division of Tata Motors Limited, Volvo division of
Zhejiang Geely Holding Group, Daimler AG, Porsche AG, Mazda Motor
Corporation, Nissan Motor Company, Ford Motor Company, and Hyundai Motor
Company.
Charts of Manufacturer Shares of the Worst Midsize SUVs in 2012
First is a bar graph of the auto manufacturer shares of the 10 worst
midsize sport-utility vehicles in 2012.
The 10 worst midsize SUVs are rather broadly distributed among
manufacturers, although General Motors heads the group.
Next is a bar graph of the auto manufacturer shares of the 20 worst
midsize sport-utility vehicles in 2012.
Chart of the Reliability GPAs of the Top 11 and
Bottom 20 Midsize SUVs
The following bar graph depicts the Overall Reliability GPAs of the 11 best
midsize sport-utility vehicles and 20 worst midsize sport-utility vehicles in 2012.
|
Caution |
When the number of model years of
data (appearing in the far right column) for a vehicle
is limited to more recent years, the reliability GPAs,
Average GPA, and Minimum GPA of that vehicle may be less
reflective of the vehicle's reliability over a longer
period of time. |
The Auto Reliability GPAs are automobile reliability
statistics that are obtained from Consumer Reports' auto reliability
survey data summarized in the reliability tables of (1) Consumer Reports: New Car
Buying Guide: 2012, (2) Consumer Reports: Used Car Buying Guide: 2012, and
(3) the April 2012 issue of the Consumer Reports magazine.
The method of computation of the GPAs is probably familiar to nearly every college, technical school, and high school student.
A Grade Point of 4.00 (that is, an A) is given to a Consumer Reports Used Car Verdict
of "Much Better Than Average," a GP of 3.00 (that is, a B) is given to a CR
"Better Than Average" rating, a GP of 2.00 (that is, a C) to an "Average"
rating, a GP of 1.00 (that is, a D) to a "Worse Than Average" rating, and a
GP of 0.00 (that is, an F) to a "Much Worse Than Average" rating. A
4-year Grade Point Average (GPA) is an average of the Grade Points and is computed using
Microsoft's Average(a:b,[c:d],...) function. The Overall GPA given in the
table and chart above is the average of the four 4-year GPAs.
AutoOnInfo.net: Helping to inform consumers which autos, brands,
and manufacturers are better than good and worse than bad since 2001.
|